Priestesses Revisited

In his essay, Priestesses in the Church, C. S. Lewis draws an analogy between an English dance party and the church. He quotes a character from the Jane Austin novel, Pride and Prejudice: “I should like balls infinitely better,” said Caroline Bingley, “if they were carried out in a different manner ...It would surely be much more rational if conversation rather than dancing made the order of the day.” “Much more rational, I dare say.” replied her brother, “but it would not be nearly so much like a ball.” Lewis’s explained the analogy. “The proposed arrangement (women’s ordination as priests) would make us so much more rational “but not nearly so much like a Church” (from, God in the Dock, 234-5).Lewis wrote in the 1960’s before the practice was accepted in the Church of England. The “proposed arrangement” is now standard practice. But the argument Lewis makes is still THE argument. Lewis was a prophet in many ways and prophetic truth is often not recognized until the error plays out and has its full effect. Lewis’s essential point is that the church is a sacrament. It is the visible sign of the invisible reality of God as he has been revealed in Christ. It may make rational sense, based on human logic, to rearrange it to make it more acceptable or attractive to people in any given age. But doing so would make the church less like what is supposed to be—a visible sign of eternal truth. Jesus Christ was a man. He is described as the bridegroom, while his church is described as the bride. This mystery of Ephesians 6 is proclaimed most profoundly in the Eucharist, which is also a reflection of the heavenly scene described in Revelation 4 and 5. To represent this mystery accurately requires that the person representing the Bridegroom be male. An icon must accurately reflect the truth it portrays—or, in the place of truth it will communicate error. To say that a woman can represent a man in the marital mystery is to say that gender is, essentially, interchangeable. It is no mere coincidence that this issue coincides in the church with the issue of homosexuality. It is the same issue.The error of clericalism in the church has greatly contributed to the error of women priests. Clericalism overemphasizes the gifts and position of the clergy in relationship to gifts possessed by other members of the body. My late mentor and friend, Bishop Cahoon used to say that Episcopalians viewed the priest as the person they paid to be a Christian for them. The undervaluing of other gifts and functions understandably leads to a false valuing of priesthood as the end all and be all of ministry. Therefore, a necessary part of the opposition to priestesses is a reemphasis on the gifts of each member of the body. Misogyny has also been an issue. Many priestess opponents harbored a secret (and sometimes not so secret) dislike of women in general. That is to say, many who were right about this one issue were wrong about several others. The unattractiveness of their errors more than outweighed their witness to the truth. Thus, women who wanted to use their gifts to serve in the church were told that, not only could they not be priests, they couldn’t do any other meaningful or valued thing in the church either. But it was mostly error that carried the day. Which is why so many churches do things that make rational sense, but make them look not so much like a church.

Bishop Scarlett

Bp. Scarlett was born in Walnut Creek, California and was raised in the East Bay area of northern California. He attended the University of Oregon, where he received a bachelor’s degree in Finance and Real Estate. He pursued theological studies at St. Joseph of Arimathea Anglican Theological College in Berkeley and Fuller Seminary in Pasadena, where he received an M.A. in Theology. He received a Doctor of Ministry from Denver Seminary in December of 2020.

Bp. Scarlett began his ministry as a lay reader by founding St. Mark’s Church in Kentfield, CA. in 1983. He was ordained as a Deacon in February of 1986 and moved to Birmingham, Alabama. He spent his brief time there traveling around the south, visiting and serving Anglican churches in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina and Florida. He was called to St. Matthew’s Church in Newport Beach in October of 1986. He was ordained as a priest at St. Matthew’s in December of 1986 and has served as rector of St. Matthew’s since that time. In 2013, Bishop Scarlett was elected to be Bishop of the Diocese of the Holy Trinity. He was consecrated as Bishop in October of 2013.

Bp. Scarlett and his wife Nancy have three adult sons, Alexander, Eric and Michael. They are residents of Irvine, CA, having lived in Woodbridge since 1987.

http://www.thedht.org
Previous
Previous

The Fruits of the Fast

Next
Next

Failure in the Spiritual Battle